Page 87 (1/1)

He paused, and we all looked at him expectantly

"I suppose, Doctor Thorndyke," he said, "you read the newspapers?"

"I don't," replied Thorndyke "But I ascertain, for purely business purposes, what they contain"

"Then," said Mr Bellingha of certain human remains, apparently portions of a mutilated body?"

"Yes, I have seen those reports and filed them for future reference"

"Exactly Well, now, it can hardly be necessary for me to tell you that those remains--the mutilated remains of some poor murdered creature, as there can be no doubt they are--have seenificance for me You will understand what I mean; and I want to ask you if--if they have estion to you"

Thorndyke paused before replying, with his eyes bent thoughtfully on the floor, and we all looked at hith, "that you should associate these remains with the mystery of your brother's disappearance I should like to say that you are wrong in doing so, but if I did I should be uncandid There are certain facts that do, undoubtedly, seeest a connection, and, up to the present, there are no definite facts of a contrary significance"

Mr Bellinghahed deeply and shifted uncomfortably in his chair

"It is a horrible affair!" he said huskily; "horrible! Would youus just how the matter stands in your opinion--what the probabilities are, for and against?"

Again Thorndyke reflected awhile, and it see to discuss the subject However, the question had been asked pointedly, and eventually he answered: "At the present stage of the investigation it is not very easy to state the balance of probabilities The matter is still quite speculative The bones which have been found hitherto (for we are dealing with a skeleton, not with a body) have been exclusively those which are useless for personal identification; which is, in itself, a rather curious and striking fact The general character and died ht, and the date of deposition appears to be in agreement with the date of his disappearance"

"Is it known, then, when they were deposited?" Mr Bellingham asked

"In the case of those found at Sidcup it seems possible to deduce an approximate date The watercress-bed was cleaned out about two years ago, so they could not have been lying there longer than that; and their condition suggests that they could not have been there e of the soft structures left Of course, I a froe of the matter"